Modern friendship

Jigsha is the first friend who I claimed as my own after moving back to Knoxville and ultimately breaking up with my then-boyfriend of five years. Crappy work schedules as they are, I had little opportunity to develop friendships with people who had no allegiance to my ex, but Jigsha’s schedule often mirrored my own, and we found ourselves hanging out quite a bit in late 2008/early 2009. Knowing my taste for silly ’80s dance music, she got me into hanging out at the neighborhood dive bar/dance hub that would ultimately serve as the breeding ground of my relationship with the Modern Love Machine.

Together, Jigsha and I have nurtured our desires to not just live life and grow but to Live Life and Grow. We talk of our dreams over tea and snacks, we outline our goals at the beginning of each year, we challenge each other to do the hard stuff and remind one another to be still and take it all in from time to time. By nature, she’s a hostess — always planning social gatherings and trying to introduce people she thinks would get along famously — and because of that she’s often the center of my social universe.

Jigsha stayed at the Modern Abode last night because her house was empty of furniture. She’s moving to Florida this week for a new job, an advancement in her career. In sharing the news on her Facebook page a few weeks back, she said, “My boss once told me, ‘Make ready come to you.’ Ready is here.”

It’s the very definition of bittersweet. To be thrilled for your friend who isn’t too scared of change to make a big one but absolutely devastated that one of your very dearest friends will no longer be a three-minute drive away or the center of your social universe. I’m proud of her for stepping outside her comfort zone but scared of what it means for my own comfort zone.

with Jigsha during one of the many festive birthday celebrations

______________________________________________________________

Even before Jigsha indicated she’d be leaving, I’d thought plenty about how our generation is far more transient than the generations that preceded and what impact that has on our friendships. Our grandparents tended to make roots where or close to where they grew up (well, I guess my grandfather’s involvement with the Air Force is an exception in that). My parents’ generation seemed to wander a bit for college but hardly wandered any further. My closest friends and I have been all over, and I’m not sure any of us are totally settled.

We have Facebook and e-mail and cheap cell phone plans and Twitter and blogs, all of which make it easy to keep track of one another. But the most fulfilling moments of friendship come not over a text message, but in time spent face-to-face. I can count on one hand the number of people in my life who I trust and love enough that I can say anything to without fear of judgment and with expectation of an honest reaction; they are my council. And by tomorrow, the only one of them who will live in the same city as I is my husband.

There are benefits to having friends spread out around the country. I always have interesting places to visit, and I don’t have to spring for a hotel room. The variety of their achievements and successes remind me to keep working at my own dreams and goals. And the random texts, e-mails and Facebook messages can be a turning point in an otherwise bad day.

The thing I wonder about is the long-term effect of it all. Are we all going to wake up one day and realize our chance at having deep-rooted communities is gone? Is our definition of community a much less physical one, and will that suffice as we age? Will we all be more open to new friendships as we grow older because of our smaller, less-rooted physical communities? What do you think?

I’ll ponder it some more on my flight to Florida later this summer.

Posted in friendship, life | 3 Comments

Friday Flashback: Sunshine

So today I’m kicking off something that I think will be a semi-regular if not weekly feature here. I spend a lot of time on Spotify looking for new music to listen to, and while I enjoy discovering new music, I need to be honest. I really spend time digging up new music so that my music taste doesn’t get fully stuck in its default rut, which is music from about 1963-2004.

Thanks to my parents’ musical tastes and a lack of a sibling to expose me to more current stuff, I grew up listening to ’60s, ’70s and ’80s music. I was coming of age in time to really latch on to ’90s alternative, hip-hop and rap. Really what it means is that if you’re entering a trivia contest and the likelihood of questions about the British Invasion, Singer and Songwriter movement, ’80s New Wave and ’90s alternative/hip-hop/rap are high, I am your gal.

New music is hip, but there are some amazing gems from the old days that I think everyone should know and love. That’s what Friday Flashback is all about. (Plus, it’s Friday. Who wants to spend a lot of effort on anything?)

Today is all about sunshine. The weather in Knoxville has been especially obnoxious this week, which isn’t totally unusual in March. On Monday we got an inch and a half of rain. Yesterday it was 35 degrees and lunchtime. But today, today it is in the mid-60s and the sun is beating down. After lunch my coworkers and I were peering outside our office window to the pond on our company’s campus, and there were dudes playing with remote-control speedboats. And then, the will to work was gone.

I Can See Clearly Now by Johnny Cash reached No. 1 on the Billboard Hot 100 chart in 1972, and I don’t remember the first time I heard it because it’s pretty much been in my rotation for my entire life. Jimmy Cliff covered the song in 1993 for Cool Runnings, which is, of course, a great movie.

And you can’t mention sunshine without mentioning one of my favorite Beatles songs, Here Comes the Sun, from the Abbey Road album.

What sunshine song should we add?

Posted in music | Comments Off

How to cook: an introduction

Thanks to all of y’all who voted in my little exploratory poll from the other week. I really do appreciate getting a sense of what y’all are interested in reading about. I’m especially excited that there were a lot of votes for food, since I probably spend more of my waking hours thinking about food than any of those other topics combined. Plus, I’ve had ambitions of recounting my journey from someone who didn’t particularly like (or know how) to cook to someone who smugly appreciates when someone calls her a foodie.

Bacon-topped meatloaf by The Modern Gal
the meatloaf referenced in this post, in progress

I know quite a few of my Modern Friends are well acquainted with how to cook well, so maybe it’s an exercise in futility. I still occasionally have a conversation with someone who confesses to not know how to cook or claims to not enjoy it. Now I know not everyone will enjoy cooking, but “not enjoying it” is often just a code word for not knowing how to do it correctly without getting overly frustrated as was the case for me for several years.

Which is why I want to chronicle the journey of my love affair with food — specifically food not cooked by a professional chef (with perhaps the occasional exception). Some of it will come in the form of how-to posts, while other posts will just be a word vomit of thoughts about cooking. And because food is such a mutual enjoyment of the Modern Love Machine and mine, maybe just maybe the MLM will feel compelled to write or at least comment on the blog (because he does lurk here). I cannot promise the fabulous photography that other food writers are so good at because my “good” camera is slow and fussy, but I will do my best to make good use of the fantastic natural lighting in our kitchen. Or I will use my iPhone because it’s easier.

I’m going to create a page in my table of contents bar where all the posts can be easily found for all of posterity to enjoy. If you have any specific topics you’d like me to cover, lemme know in a comment or by e-mail at themoderngal(at)gmail(dot)com. Otherwise, thanks again for being a friend.

Posted in food and drink | 2 Comments

Two steps forward … or not at all

As a sportswriter, I often had to write about athletes getting injured and their recoveries. Injuries to the legs, knees, ankles and feet usually were the worst, because of their significance in everyday movement (at least for those of us who are used to relying on them every day.) More often than not, an athlete has to rest for a dedicated amount of time and then very slowly ease back into physical activity before they can even think about jumping back into their sport.

When the orthopedic doctor grounded me for the stress fracture, I certainly did not think of myself in terms of those athletes I used to write about.** I wasn’t nearly as active or accomplished, and all I did was overdo it on a running routine. All this to say, I’ve been surprised at how difficult it’s been to fully recover from my injury, although I probably shouldn’t have been.

I wore the boot all of December, through Christmas and New Years and went back to the doctor a day and a half before I left for India. He told me I could be the one to decide whether or not I left the boot at home during my trip, but with the caveat, “If it hurts even a little bit you should take it with you.” Of course I was not going to take it with me — that was a foregone conclusion. My leg had hurt very little the week before the appointment, but who in their right mind would want to wear a boot during 18 hours of flying (times two), 16 hours of Germany layovering and a week and a half in a country that is not particularly accessible? Only crazy people, that’s who.

To my satisfaction, my leg did not hurt once during the trip, and we did just enough walking around to test it. In the wake of returning home and shaking the jet lag, I felt sluggish and unhealthy and was determined to get back into a serious workout plan — I had an aggressive schedule of swimming, fitness classes at the Y and the rehab walk/run plan from the doctor to tackle.

And almost immediately my leg began to hurt. The pain wasn’t necessarily in the same spot — it moved, it grew, it diminished, it moved again, rinse, lather, repeat. Scared of reaggravating the injury, I stopped for a few days until it stopped hurting. Then I started working out again, and it started to hurt again.

After resting, icing and wearing the boot for a few days, I started back at square one: swimming with a pull buoy, which was the one thing the doctor allowed me to do while wearing the boot full time. And I was pissed and frustrated beyond all get out: my month in the boot was up, my leg did not hurt when I was done with it, so why wasn’t I completely healthy and ready to work out again? Usually I have a problem with lack of motivation, but for once all I wanted to do was be physically active, but my body wouldn’t allow it. Not to mention the Olympic triathlon in May I’d had my heart set on was out. I would have had to start training at the end of February, but I couldn’t even run a few feet, let alone the 5k that is a standard prerequisite to starting a tri training program.

I kept swimming every other day, just to do something. My leg would hurt mildly during my swims, even without the kicking, but a little ice at the end usually made it go away. After about a week, the mild pain went away, so I tried mixing in a few sets of breast stroke with kicking. The mild pain returned, solved by icing and a day’s rest. And thus, a workout routine was born for February: swims every other day, mixing sets with and without the buoy, followed by 30 minutes of icing and, if necessary, a couple of hours in the boot. Two weeks ago I tried a random Zumba class and put on my walking boot before my leg even had a chance to start hurting. On Sunday I returned to the first step of the doctor’s rehab plan, an unimpressive five minutes of running mixed with 30 minutes of walking. It’s a far cry from the 6 milers that contributed to my injury back in October, but by God, I woke up Monday morning and my leg did not hurt. And that is already an improvement over the past four months.

There are o pledged at the end of the 2012 triathlon season to spend time this winter working on my swimming stroke. I wanted to be a confident freestyler so I wouldn’t necessarily have to rely on the breast stroke to get through an open-water swim. Swimming with a pull buoy forced my hand on that one. Since I couldn’t kick in the pool, I focused on every detail of my stroke and breathing to keep from getting bored and now my stroke is cleaner, my breathing is smoother and I’m faster. Would I trade those things to have not been injured at all? Probably so, but I guess I’ll be able to answer that better if and when I get back to tri training.

**This begs a more serious question: at one point does someone turn into an athlete? Did an Olympic triathlon make me one? Or does it take more? I certainly don’t feel comfortable calling myself an athlete, but I can’t put my finger on why.

Posted in health and exercise, personal experience, sports | 2 Comments

Saturday sounds

I used to be really, really awful at discovering new music, but the internet, Spotify and Sirius radio have made me less of a music n00b. There are some decent tunes out there right now, which is good because my playlist can only be stuck in the ’80s for so long before it starts looking a little dated. What, it’s looked dated for about 20 years, you say? I’m not buying that.

Y’all have heard Macklemore’s Thrift Shop by now, right? It’s just the sort of absurdity I love in my hip hop music. Well now I present to you, a literal MS Paint interpretation of Thrift Shop. There’s only one thing to say: This is f*cking awesome.** (Ok, two things to say … if you are unfamiliar with Thrift Shop, please note the lyrics/artwork are a touch profane.)

The Modern Love Machine’s big Christmas gift to me was a pair of apple green Beats by Dre. They’re beautiful with luxurious sound and they do a GREAT job of blocking out the jibber jabber that comes with working in an “open concept” office space. I’ve been building a Spotify playlist to go with those Beats at the office, which I now present to you. It’s mostly new stuff with a little bit of sentimental old stuff and is a little on the mellow side since I need to be able to think in complete sentences while listening. The songs are in no particular order other than the order in which I added them, so I recommend listening on shuffle if you have Spotify.*** And if you are reading this post through a blog reader, you’re going to have to click through to actually see the playlist.

Happy (mellow) Saturday!

**Shout outs to the Modern Love Machine and Gizmodo for finding this one.
***Shout outs to some of my Tweeps who suggested a few songs when my playlist needed lengthening. And I stole a couple of entries from Dooce’s new tunes posts, because she’s had some good ones lately.

Posted in music | Comments Off

Taking on the Taj Mahal

A few folks I know who have also traveled to India felt underwhelmed at best by their Taj Mahal experience. I totally get it. There’s this thing of beauty that is supposedly so remarkable that it’s oft photographed and referenced making it completely familiar, even when it’s far away. And then when you’re there and it’s in front of you, it doesn’t quite offer the transformative experience that you expected. I hear this happens often with the Mona Lisa.

My experience was different.

The Modern Gal at the Taj Mahalme, without glasses, doing the touristy thing

But first, a history, because I’m not sure the Taj Mahal’s story is quite as well-known as her appearance. Mughal emperor Shah Hahan was so grief-stricken when his third and favorite wife died during the birth of their 14th(!!) child. He expressed his grief and love for his wife by commissioning the Taj. Work begain in 1632, and the mausoleum — the big, white marble structure you’re familiar with — was completed in 1648. The other buildings that comprise the Taj were completed five years later.

No spitting? No funno spitting? no fun.

camel at the Taj Mahaldidn’t get the memo

The emperor’s wife is buried in the floor in the very center of the mausoleum, and Shah Jahan is buried somewhere inside too (I believe our guide said he was off to the side, a sort of diss made by one of his sons.) To the west of the mausoleum is the mosque, and because the emperor was obsessed with symmetry, a matching building was erected to the east side and presumably used as a guest house. The buildings and gardens are surrounded by walls, and there’s a gate that would be mighty impressive on its own grounds but pales in comparison to the mausoleum.

Gate to the Taj Mahal

impressive gate is impressive

Catching the first glimpse of the Taj Mahal through the gate gave me that weird out-of-body feeling that I get when I’m finally experiencing something that’s much anticipated. You know, like when you’re living your wedding day/graduation/other milestone — things Hollywood directors love to make movies about because they’re supposed to be so monumental — and you’re like, ‘Hey, this thing is actually happening RIGHT NOW and it’s … surreal? Mind-boggling? Not actually happening?’ That’s where I was when the Taj introduced herself.

First glimpse of the Taj Mahal

The Taj Mahal by @themoderngal

We had arrived in Agra mid-afternoon and were on our way to our lunch/supper meal (we seriously only ate twice a day every day) when our tour guide for the day told us we’d be heading to the Taj Mahal after eating. This was news to us — we had all been of the mindset that we’d get up early and go at sunrise the next day, but the tour guide was having none of it. As it turns out, that was a good thing. The palette of the sunset was a gorgeous backdrop to the Taj and intensified as we got closer to the building and the evening drew nearer. With the changing sky and the building growing ever larger in our viewfinders, there was a very subtle shift in the experience. It stopped seeming so surreal and familiar and started feeling like a far more profound thing.

Taj Mahal, up close by @themoderngal

What I think is most remarkable about the Taj — aside from its roots in a love story — is seeing its details up close. I had always been of the mind that the marble was etched just with some sort of black finish, but I was so, so, so wrong. It’s also encrusted with precious and semi-precious stones like lapis lazuli, carnelian and jade. The color of the white marble has a depth that isn’t evident in long-distance photography. And while perhaps the size is about what you would expect from photos or perhaps even smaller, there’s still something breathtaking about being close enough to touch it.

Up close to the Taj Mahal by @themoderngal

Detailed inlay of walls at the Taj Mahalobligatory ‘does not do it justice’ comment

The guest house at the Taj Mahalthe guest house, not to be confused with the mosque

Technical notes for if you ever decide to visit:

  • We had planned to get up super early and go at sunrise. During the summer this is a great idea (hardly any crowd, no lines, beautiful sky, easy photography). During the winter this is a bad idea as the overwhelming fog may make your visit to the Taj Mahal a disappointing one. You can get the same benefits of sunrise by going just a bit before it closes for the day. Also, it’s closed on Fridays so don’t go on a Friday.
  • Take your camera but not much else. By the time you get to Agra you’ll probably be used to this, but many things are banned at touristy locations for safety or religious purposes.
  • You’ll probably also be used to this, but you must still prepare yourself to walk past all the hawkers and beggars at the edge of the Taj property. They’re relentless.
  • The Taj was one of the two places that members of our group were asked to be in photos with Indians just because we were Westerners. Don’t be alarmed by this. It’s a curiosity thing rather than anything malicious.

the wall and the moonrise on the way out

Posted in history, travel | 9 Comments

Programming notes

So I wanted to take a quick time out to ask a question and mull the direction of The Modern Gal. I am totally of the mind that when you blog, you must primarily do it for yourself or you will quickly lose interest or get frustrated. However, I’m also somewhat of the mind that a blog without comment conversations or at least some interest from readers is really just a journal. I love journals, but I prefer the MG to be slightly more than a journal if people really are reading it.

My current problem is that I have so many ideas of what I’d like to write about that I can’t decide how to narrow them down into a manageable list of blog posts — obviously a good problem to have. I cannot write them all because my life as it is now does not allow for daily blogging. I’d prefer to be living the stories rather than spending all my time retelling them. I would love to share more about one interest/hobbies or another interest/hobby or all of them, BUT if you’re not interested in reading about them, well, I see no reason to do it.

So, if you read the MG ever, which clearly you do, then I’m interested in your input. I may not do what you tell me, but I will keep your suggestions in the back of my mind. You may express your suggestions by voting in this poll or spelling them out with a comment. For a better idea of what I’d be writing about, read the explanations BELOW the poll FIRST. Oh yeah, you can vote for as many as you’d like because democracy is awesome!

And thank YOU for being a friend (sung to the tune of the Golden Girls’ theme song) of the Modern Gal!

And when I say …

Food, I mean tips on how to get into cooking in the first place, how to cook for one or two people and how to get better at it. I would share some recipes and food photography porn, but not a whole lot.

Home Decor, I mean sharing my favorite home decor photo porn with a sampling of our own adventures in home repair.

Travel, I mean sharing more photos from my own travels as well as tips on how to become a smarter traveler and how to do things that occasionally scare you.

Movies/Books/TV, I mean sharing my opinions and reviews. I should note that I tend to focus my life’s efforts into one of the three at a time, and my focus tends to shift to a different category every year or two.

Did I just manage to say porn twice in one post? Oops, I did it again. Hooray, SEO!

Posted in poll, public service announcement | 6 Comments

For your consideration

For the past three years I’ve set out to watch every Best Picture nominee before the Oscars. It’s sort of a complementary mission to my Life List’s “Watch every Academy Award Best Picture winner,” not because I want to see every movie ever nominated but because I like to make the most educated judgment on the Academy’s decisions that I can make. I can’t rightly say one movie deserves the win if I haven’t seen all of its competition, right?

This year, by the grace of God and Regal Entertainment Group (based in Knoxville — what up!), I completed that mission for the first time. So now, I present to you my thoughts on each BP nominee plus who I think will win and who I think should win. Unfortunately, I think my mission has backfired on me as I’m as muddled on my opinions as ever. I ran out of time to cover all the movies included in the Best and Supporting Actor and Actress categories, so I’ll just give general thoughts on those.

Amour: Winner of the Palme d’Or at Cannes and awards at many other international festivals, Amour is a story of a dying woman and her husband who serves as her caregiver. It is intense, it is beautiful and it is incredibly sad. I managed to hold it together after it ended until I reached my car, and then I cried ugly, ugly buckets of tears on the 15-minute drive home. Worthy of Best Picture? Absolutely, but the Academy will give it Best Foreign Language Film and leave it at that, and that’s OK with me too.

Argo: Argo has gotten all the pre-Oscars love. I saw it when it first came out, which means I’ve seen a lot of movies since then — which is probably hurting Argo in my brain. It’s a fantastically great movie, but I think it’s hurt a bit by a mediocre performance by Ben Affleck. Alan Arkin? Give me more of him please or Argo fuck yourself. While I’d place it in my top three or so, it wasn’t my favorite.

Beasts of the Southern Wild: I love many things about this movie. The storyline has a subtle charm that I think is the mark of a great movie. For as much as I know about the poor parts of cajun country, this depicts life there pretty dang well. The fact that Quvenzhané Wallis was five and six during filming and gives an incredibly convincing performance makes me consider giving my vote for Best Actress to her and Best Director to Benh Zeitlin for coaxing that performance from her and a mostly untrained cast. I don’t think it has a chance in hell of winning, but I think it’s a must-see regardless.

Django Unchained: Let me start by saying I’ve been a pretty faithful Quentin Tarantino fan. Obviously Pulp Fiction is a great movie, and I was particularly impressed with Inglorious Basterds. But Django Unchained turned out to be the one movie of this year’s nominees that I absolutely hated — and I didn’t decide that until more two hours into it. I’m not a huge fan of violence, but I live with it as long as it doesn’t become greater than the plot. By the last hour of Django Unchained, the violence had gotten to be too much and erased everything I enjoyed about the bounty-hunting plot and Christoph Waltz.

Les Misérables: I very much enjoyed Les Mis, but I very much do not think it’s worthy of the BP win. The performances were, at best, uneven. Anne Hathaway’s was strong but brief. Hugh Jackman’s started off a little weak — and there’s too much transformation in Jean Valjean’s life at that point to allow a weak performance — but got better and better as the film progressed. Russell Crowe was so hesitant and unconfident while singing that it ruined an otherwise great performance from him. The rest of the cast was pretty good, but when you tie it all together it was a movie that was enjoyable to watch but not much more than that.

Life of Pi: I’m having a hard time evaluating this one. Life of Pi is my favorite book. I love the exploration of religion, reality and survival. Even though the surprise is no longer, I re-read the ending of the book just to revisit the lessons. So do I love the movie Life of Pi because it’s my favorite book or do I love it because it’s an incredible movie? I don’t know the answer. I do know that Ang Lee took a book that obviously was not easy to transform into a film and made a fantastic film.

Lincoln: As a former political reporter, I enjoyed the inside baseball that was depicted in Lincoln and the fact that the movie was more about getting the 13th Amendment passed than it was about Lincoln itself. It didn’t over-glorify the president, which I appreciate, and the performances were strong across the board. I think it’s got all the makings of a Best Picture winner, and I’d be totally OK with it winning.

Silver Linings Playbook: This was the film that I enjoyed the most. I think Bradley Cooper killed it, and Jennifer Lawrence did almost as good of a job. I love when a film gives a twisted take on an otherwise generic love story. I also love when it can deliver both dark and happy without making you feel like either of the main characters in Silver Linings Playbook. Do I think it will win? No, and it probably shouldn’t because most enjoyable doesn’t necessarily mean best.

Zero Dark Thirty: This was the movie I didn’t want to see and didn’t want to like. And it completely won me over. The torture tactics were tough to watch, but fortunately they did not become the whole point of the movie. I appreciated getting a sense of how Bin Laden was hunted down (however accurate it was) without having politics rammed down my throat.

Predictions

  • Will win: Argo — it’s hard to deny the buzz and all the pre-Oscars awards Argo has won.
  • Should win: I’m going to go with Lincoln, though Zero Dark Thirty and Life of Pi would make this a decision that would keep me up at night.

Other Categories

  • Best Director is a weird category because of who wasn’t nominated. Steven Spielberg seems to be the favorite, but I would give it to Ang Lee, Michael Haneke or Benh Zeitlin. Spielberg’s cast was so seasoned it could have directed itself in that film. I think Lee, Haneke and Zeitlin pulled off far greater feats.
  • Best Actor has been all but declared for Daniel Day-Lewis for like four months. He was very good and is plenty deserving, but I’d like to see Bradley Cooper win. His performance dominated Silver Linings Playbook, and throughout that movie I forgot it was Bradley Cooper I was watching — an award-winning achievement in and of itself. (I did not see The Master or Flight)
  • Best Actress appears to be Jennifer Lawrence’s to lose, and I’m ok with that. I think Jessica Chastain and Emmanuelle Riva are equally deserving, so I have a hard time calling this one for any of them. (I did not see The Impossible)
  • Best Supporting Actor is one of the hardest to choose. Of the ones I saw (Philip Seymour Hoffman being the exception), I thought all did a great job. I think I’d give it to Christoph Waltz as he was an incredibly likable part in a movie I otherwise hated, and he stole the show.
  • Best Supporting Actress was already given to Anne Hathaway, right? I don’t think there’s any discussion to be had here. (I did not see The Master or The Sessions)
  • Best Foreign Language Film has to go to Amour, right? Because it was an incredibly worthy Best Picture nominee, and the Academy will want to spread it around this year with so many good options. The film No looks very good and is on my list to see, but I think it has hardly any hope as a spoiler. (Amour is the only of these I’ve seen)
  • Best Cinematography goes to Life of Pi, because I think it was the most visually stunning of them all, though I think Skyfall is a worthy contender. (I did not see Anna Karenina). Life of Pi also gets Best Visual Effects, because Richard Parker. (Only saw Life of Pi and the Avengers)
  • Best Animated Short — throwing this one in since I managed to watch all these. The bets are on Paperman winning, but I preferred Head Over Heels and Adam and Dog. All three were good, however.

I’ll fill out my ballot tomorrow afternoon and let you know how I do.

Posted in movies | Comments Off

The other side of India

Part of the beautiful side of visiting India is seeing its remarkable history in the form of monuments, temples, mosques, forts and other landmarks and the stories behind them. Of course there’s the Taj Mahal (oh hey, next blog post), but there are so many beautiful and breathtaking places that are overshadowed by the Taj. At each spot we had a guide to share the history. Knowing what I know of India now, I wouldn’t be surprised if the history we got were more tall tales than they were accurate accounts, but they’re definitely part of the experience.

This post is a more practical one. I would love to either wow you with photos of the non-Taj places or to help you plan your own trip to India one day. Our itinerary was a fairly common one covering the Golden Triangle that links Delhi, Agra and Jaipur followed by a quick flight to Mumbai for the wedding festivities. Descriptions and a few select photos first. If you’re not interested in those, skip on down to the bottom for the complete photo gallery.

New and Old Delhi

Delhi was difficult because it was my introduction to India, and therefore I spent my time there adjusting to culture shock and overcoming being awake for 40 hours straight (not to mention crossing 10 time zones). It’s crowded, it’s confusing and it’s crazy polluted. It’s still worth visiting for a day or two for a few choice spots, including the large complex of government buildings near India Gate.

  1. Jama Masjid, pictured above, is the largest mosque in India. It requires a trip through Old Delhi, which makes it worth it alone, but the scope of it in person is breathtaking. You have to take off your shoes* to enter the courtyard area, and if you’re a woman you’re given something that resembles a hospital gown for extra cover, but it’s a small effort to see something so grand.
  2. India Gate is the national monument of India and was built to honor those who died in WWI and the Afghan Wars. It was the site of the recent demonstrations to protest poor reactions to the horrific rape that happened in New Delhi. (Not included in my gallery below, see picture in previous post).
  3. Raj Ghat is a park memorializing Mahatma Gandhi. The park specifically marks where Gandhi was cremated after his assassination, and at the very spot is an eternal flame. While we were there, there was a group of men sitting in prayer and chanting at the flame.
  4. Lotus Temple is a Bahá’í House of Worship. The Bahá’í Faith allows opens its worshiping spaces to all, regardless of religion or distinction, and welcomes them to worship God in their own way.

Agra

Agra is home of the Taj Mahal, and we saw nothing else inside the city while we were there. Agra is smaller and poorer by Delhi standards, but the drives through its streets rival some of the more ridiculous roller coasters I’ve ridden. Outside of Agra was one of my favorite places in all of India, Fatehpur Sikri. Essentially a small city and briefly the capital of the Mughal empire in the late 16th century, Fatehpur Sikri is some of the best preserved examples of Mughal architecture and a World Heritage site. The Mughal emperor Akbar commissioned the city, and Akbar is one of my favorite Mughal characters. Though I don’t condone polygamous relationships, I am still amused by Akbar’s keeping of a harem of mistresses and his love of games (we were told Hide and Seek and something that resembled parcheesi — but I say take that with a grain of salt). We had a great time running around like idiots through the open courtyards. There’s also another Jama Masjid and the tomb of Salim Chishti. Salim Chisti was a favorite spiritual figure of Akbar’s, because he believed the saint was responsible for granting him a male heir. Women (example: Carla Bruni) continue to visit the tomb today in hopes they too will be granted a child.

Jaipur

Jaipur was my favorite of the three Golden Triangle cities. It’s somewhat known for its textiles and crafts, which make it a great shopping spot, but it has this charming vibe that was missing from Delhi and Agra. It didn’t hurt that we had our first solid dose of sun since arriving and the temperatures were hovering right around perfection.** It’s called the Pink City because the buildings in the central city were painted pink to honor Prince Edward’s visit in 1876.

  1. Jantar Mantar is a collection of massive outdoor astronomy instruments and another World Heritage site. The one pictured above is the world’s largest sundial, accurate to the second. There are instruments for tracking the heavenly bodies, including each constellation of the zodiac.
  2. Amer Fort was the capital for the Rajput clan and built by the commander of Akbar’s army. You can ride elephants to get from the parking lot up to the fort high on its hill. Spoiler alert: riding an elephant is not as cool as it sounds, but you have do it for the photo alone. The fort is a maze of beautiful structures, including one structure that’s covered with mirrors. And unlike historical spots in America where you’re prohibited from doing and touching all the things, you’re pretty much given free reign to run around and climb whatever you please in India. Amer Fort makes for great views of surrounding vistas during some mean games of hide and seek. With monkeys. Spoiler alert: Monkeys are mean.

Mumbai, aka Bombay

Mumbai is my favorite. It’s this nifty mix of traditional India, Britain colonialism and a cosmopolitan big city. It’s a pain in the ass to navigate because of crippling traffic that is unlike any other traffic in the country. It has beaches and a tropical disposition. We spent much of our time participating in the three days of wedding festivities and recovering from the wedding festivities, but we managed to squeeze in a day tour of the city and a day trip away from the city.

  1. Churchgate Terminus or Victoria Terminus. You’ve probably heard about how crazy the Indian train systems are, but you really have to ride or at least see it to understand. Enter the Churchgate and Victoria stations for free and just watch a train arrival. Indian math = there’s always room for one more. Victoria Terminus is the more beautiful one, Churchgate is probably the more accessible one. And if you’ve seen Slumdog Millionaire, you might already be familiar with Churchgate.
  2. Gateway of India/Taj Mahal Palace Hotel is probably the most touristy spot in Mumbai. The Gateway of India is a monument built by the British, for the British, but it’s still a popular spot for Indians to visit — Indians love to take photos with Westerners, and we had our pictures made at least a dozen times here. The Taj is a beautiful, British colonial-style building and the chic place to stay in Mumbai. It was one of the sites of the 2008 terrorist attacks, and there is a heavy security presence around it. It houses the lone Starbucks we saw during our trip.
  3. Marine Drive is where you can really appreciate the coastal ambiance of Mumbai. It’s known as the Queen’s Necklace because of how the streetlights along the road appear as a strand of pearls when lit. There is some expensive real estate along this drive.
  4. Mumbai rush hour — this is kind of unfair because you’re going to be forced to live it if you visit Mumbai. It’s fascinating to witness in that it will change your perspective of bad traffic, no matter where you live; just make sure someone else is driving. It took us two hours to get 12km after our day tour. Yes, you can walk faster than that, but you probably wouldn’t choose to walk it.
  5. Elephanta Island and Caves require a ferry trip, which is an experience in and of itself (especially getting on and off the boat). The caves are a World Heritage site which feature elaborate carvings of structures and images of Hindu gods. They’re perched high upon some hills and provide a great view of the entire island and the waters and lands nearby. The half-day trip is a nice getaway from the city, though just as crazy as any experience in India. And the monkeys, oh lord, the monkeys.

Click photos to embiggen and see captions

There are so many more places we didn’t get a chance to fully explore or visit that are worth seeing. One of the unfortunate things about visiting India is that you have to pick and choose — there is no way to do and see it all unless you choose to make a long-term visit.

*While in India, you get used to a lower threshold of cleanliness. You get used to taking off your shoes, eating off dirty dishes, etc. It’s not an option, you just get used to it.
**The notion that India is extremely hot all of the time is a false one. It is extremely hot all of the time during the summer. In the winter, its prevailing characteristic is fog, and that fog is omnipresent — the fog and the pollution are the reason for the haziness in most of my photos. While we were in the north, I needed at least a light cardigan every day and several mornings required my fleece jacket. The fog burned off and the temperatures warmed up a bit in Mumbai, though it was never hotter than an early summer day in the South.

Posted in history, travel | 2 Comments

Experiencing India

MG note: I have much to say about my trip to India, and I’m doing it with one extremely long post today and two more (shorter) posts in the near future. Collect ‘em all.

It’s been three weeks since I’ve returned from India, and it’s taken me about as much time to process my experience there and reacclimate to America. Finding a way to adequately explain it may be something that never happens. In fact, I think that’s the secret about visiting India (and perhaps any place in southern Asia). Your conversations with others who have been there will go like this: “Did you see/experience (fill in the blank)?” “Yes! It was … well, I just don’t know how to explain it to others.” “You never will be able to explain it.” That won’t stop me from trying, of course.

at the Jama Masjid

The most adequate one-size-fits-all explanation I can give is that India exists on a plane that is different from the one where all Western culture functions. Sure, English is a common language there, and there are plenty of first-world creature comforts, but time and space function differently in India.

The international departure terminal at the Mumbai airport captured this in a perfect little package. You and your luggage had to push your way through the mob of people that surrounds the doorway (if you don’t have a ticket, you’re not allowed inside the door). Once reaching the door, you have to show your printed ticket to a cop holding an AK-47. No printed ticket? Hopefully your negotiation skills are sharp. I have no doubt bribery would work as well. Once you’re inside the dark, dingy, noisy terminal, there are about a hundred queues of people, each 20 deep or so, that you must wait in to get additional boarding documents and check your luggage. Every line will get plugged up at some point for some unclear reason, and it may take 30 minutes to clear the problem. And there’s nothing you can do about it. The next stop is passport clearance. If your passport agent is in a good mood, you might get through in five minutes. If not, he might spent five minutes staring at you before he even accepts your passport for review. Total crap shoot. There are required patdowns at security, though the experience isn’t unlike the U.S. The gate smells fetid thanks to the Indian-style toilet nearby. I think we got to the airport 2.5 hours ahead of schedule and we barely made our plane. And my traveling companion Sarah and I each had a mild panic attack in the process. When we stepped off the plane in Munich eight hours later, the terminal by comparison is stark, white and silent. I have never in my life been so convinced I had gone deaf.

the start of Bombay rush hour. it would take us 2.5 hours to go 12 km.

The airport scene might have been the most anxiety-inducing situation, but the examples of another time and space were plentiful. There was the traffic in every city and town we visited. Lanes are merely a suggestion, and the traffic moves both ways on both sides of the road. Our drive through Agra was one of the most terrifying experiences I’ve ever had — 40-50 mph going head-first toward oncoming traffic, only to swerve or slam on brakes at the last second. Traffic is a term that covers cars, vans, trucks, rickshaws (motor-powered and otherwise), motorbikes, bicycles, pedestrians, ox-pulled carts, feral dogs, goats, etc. At one point in New Delhi, I saw a man giving a barber-style haircut in a lane of traffic. And of course, it’s completely common to see a half-dozen people on a motorbike and two-dozen people stuffed into and on top of a van designed to hold less than half of that.

Delhi traffic

And what can you say about the poverty? It is as bad as you probably imagine it is. There are child beggars everywhere (although the guidebooks often caution that these children may not be as poor as they appear to be — instead they’re pawns in scam rings). Because giving to them perpetuates exploitation, your only option is to ignore them. Shack cities sit right next to luxury high rises and Indian-style mansions. One Bombay native told us a story about a man who grew up in the slums but became successful to the point of being a millionaire. But instead of moving to more comfortable accommodations, he continued to live in the slums — under the Indian caste system he saw the slums as his place, and its inhabitants his people, and there was no reason in his mind to leave.

these were some of the few kids who didn’t beg for money or try to sell me junk.

We visited New Delhi about a week after the awful rape that made international news at the beginning of the year. By the time we got there, the demonstrations had ended as cops had blocked off the park land where the youth had been protesting. The only mention we saw of the rape was in a column in the Times of India that insinuated women were asking to be raped with the way they dressed and acted. The demonstrations were by the younger generation, who wanted to protest this awful, patriarchal attitude that pervades the older generations. This is not a bad thing.

India Gate, where the protests took place

There are some remarkable forts and monuments from the Mughals (more on those later) and gorgeous colonial architecture from the British, but perhaps the most enduring legacy of the British is the ridiculously bureaucratic nature of the country. On our last day, we spent some time at the Elephanta caves — caves adorned with elaborate carvings of Hindu gods that were partially defaced by the Portuguese and British (assholes). You have to pay for a ferry ticket to get to Elephanta Island, then you have to pay a tourism tax after about a half-mile walk toward the caves. After climbing a long stairwell (lined by people selling cheap trinkets and souvenirs), you reach the official ticket booth. Non natives pay a rate that’s about 10 times what Indians pay (fine, fair enough). You’re given a fancy, embossed ticket only to walk two feet and hand the entire, fancy embossed ticket to a guard, never to be seen again. And the bureaucracy is not without corruption. On our first day there, a driver took us around New Delhi to see some sites. Outside the complex that includes the president’s house and governmental buildings, our driver was pulled over. He gets out of the van to talk with the cop, and after about five minutes returns, grabs some rupees, mutters “black money,” and hands it over to the cop.

There are so many other things that I saw that register as “weird” on a Western culture scale but will live only in my mind. By the time something registered as unusual in my mind, it was often gone from sight, leading me to question whether I really even saw it at all. Life of Pi has been one of my favorite books for several years, and my time in India only validates the perception vs. reality theme that runs through it. And I can tell you, I would not be surprised in the least to see an orangutan floating by me on a pile of bananas.

more Delhi traffic

The thing that frustrates me in telling you about all these things is I realize it paints a picture of India that is ugly and backwards. There are actually layers of beauty and wonder woven through that are so, so difficult to capture. India as a whole is complex, paradoxical and disorienting, and it is impossible to capture this in a single description of one person’s experience there. Visiting India with a notion of fully enjoying yourself there is to be disappointed. Instead, go to experience the country, and you will not be disappointed. Would I go again? If the Modern Love Machine insisted on it, I would. If another dear friend ended up getting married there, sure. On my own motivation? Once may be enough. It’s a big, big world out there, and I’m even more determined now than ever to see as much of it as I can.

P.S. A friend of mine posted this video, “A Day in India” from the Perennial Plate, to Twitter soon after I returned. I feel like this does a better job of sharing the beauty of India than I can do with words. Enjoy.

Posted in current events, personal experience, travel | 4 Comments